User blog comment:MýnÆnglishTáwk/Getting Anglish to be written ond spoken more/@comment-1045231-20180501184417

Many loanwords have killed off inborn words so much that they are needed to be understood, or talk about things that English had no or only swith unmeansome (very uncommon) words to talk about without being swith wordy - such as "use", "try", and "change", and "date" or "fix" (well, there is "mend" - maybe a word like "during" or "focus" is a better byspel) eachwise (respectively), and many others. A lot of loanwords seem to fit in the soul (spirit) of Anglish as well - having only one speechbit (syllable), and having many kin words like "update", "bugfix", and "overuse" standing. And since talking in only clean Anglish is very unlikely, I think shooting to only cast out the most unneeded words (that are often in their first tung the same as what they would be overset to in English, which is somewhat upsetting) that have Anglish ways of being said (or eathly bitwise overset (easily calqued). f.b. "biology" --> lifelore) and will be understood by most or at least some everyday folk should be the goal: words like "people" (--> folk), "survive" (--> outlive, live on, overlive), or "case" (-> fall, befall). I have been brooking those words myself, and shooting to avoid loanwords like "exist" (--> live, stand) or "create" (--> make) in favor of other standing ways though I've not gone much further, for fear of not being understood, as I've said, and also in truth because I often forget oversettings for less meansome words. :P I've been doing this in some of my speech on other wikis and forums. I did brook "thole" for "tolerate" twice, though I don't know if I was understood.