User blog:Hjetland/Deedwords or vebs

Many folc here are writting wiþ a verb infinitive, hwich i hold hurts raþer þan helps Anglish for þis

þe infinitive had no set one in old english or oþer early germanic speeches, but þe -en in dutch (german) and oþer germanic speech verb ending were from þe class two verbs ad it merged in all oþer germanic speeches but english. þis ending was cept in its proto germanic "state" making verbs from nouns/adjectives, byspel- hard to harden cwic to cwicen and so forþ þere were /are oþer ending cept in english not in oþer germanic speeches, such as þe umlaut-se ending, byspel clean to cleanse, blood to bless and a few oþer obsolete verbs

Also, maybe say can/have/shall  as it is in England English wiþout þe æ, but a as in all, wh as hw ( whine wine merger), wr said as labialized r, and þe r is rhotic

grass/glass in plural were said as grazes/glazes, as þis is þe voicless frictative voicing/devoicing- þis happens in þ,f,s ending namewords (noun) hwen plural or hwen wending it into a verb

In early modern English until þo 1700s, þe k/g was spocen in know/gnat and so forþ, and -ght was ( and still is in norþern England English, ) said as a guttoral consonant- maybe put þis into Anglish ?

could/should/would as past of cann, shall, will, having may fills þis "role"- may is miht in past- in some Shakspeare ( a midsummers night dream) and Spencer worcs, þere is a plurel conjugation for we/ye/þey, being -en.

in þe King James Bible, do-support is not spocen