User blog comment:MýnÆnglishTáwk/Getting Anglish to be written ond spoken more/@comment-34075916-20180502211955/@comment-1045231-20180510231905

I think words like "tea" (and "plant" or "date" - short quick words without a good Theedish word to brook instead) are a better byspel than video, mostly since video has some good oversettings that could be brooked: seeband (I think Icelandish brooks something like this), showing, or film. But I think you are right: there are wisly sundry weights to casting out loanwords: the worst are those that hinder understanding, like "biology", "case", and "survive", while the best (or at least, least bad) are those that have become roots and didn't kill inborn words, like those you and I have spoken of (pointed out - also in truth not such a bad word, namely with a building like that). I do think that going too far and taking out too many words is a mistake. One thing I see that I loathe and that seems "elitist" is casting out Old Norse words - New English, which Anglish wants to build a more understandsome offshoot of, should be thought of as a mixtung of Old English and Old Norse - otherwise there would be a much more manyfold wordcraft (grammar), and then you might as well just learn Old English (a sheen tung, but thoroughly dead). I see that on the reddit, and it irks me swith much.