Threshold of loanwords

All tungs and the English tung is no outstander.

They and shift often by means of outside. Even though no tung is, some are more so than others: Icelandic, for byspell, is less ailed by outside thrakes than , which in  is less so than English, which has only 26%   (although the most oftenly brooked words are).

The Anglish Moot is a, which hopefully  a fondness of Theedish words and  their everyday  in the  and readers (you). However, for the Moot to work as a worthy fanding and not as smirksome of sundry works, it needs to be "systematic" and abide by a framework without -picking which words to.

Anglish was begotten as an to inkhorn words, Latin and Greek words brooked solely to show one's learnedness, but there is not a clear-cut : even though it is said to be at its height in the 17th hundredyear folk more than a hundreadyear before, such as Shakespeare, (Early New English) brought in outlandish words. The biggest and most clear-cut inflow of outlandish words was after 1066, the hild of Hastings, in 29% of English words being of Frankish. , this dot in time marks the end of Old English (Anglo-saxon) and the start of Middle English. It is clear therefore, why it is brooked by many as a straightforward cut-off for the influx of outlandish words.

Before 1066 several Norse (viking) words inflowed into Old English (some are listed in ). Norse and Old English were alike and some scholars say the speakers may have understood each albeit uneasily, therefore it is not easy to unmingle words from each. Scholars believe that the "they" and "are", the  of the   of the  to be, spring from Norse.

In my, some, but not all, Norse words and at the same time brooking a Teutonlandish words as a  to  a word is wholly.

Before the inflow of Norse words, there was a small inflow of Latin words with cristendom. Many linked with cristendom (byspell: anchor, angel, apostle, ark, balsam, beet, box, candle, cap, cedar, chalice, chest, circle, cook, coulter, cowl, creed, crisp, disciple, fan, fennel, fever, font, ginger, lily, lobster, martyr, mass, master, mat, minster, muscle, myrrh, nun, organ, palm, pear, palm, plant, pope, priest, psalm, raddish, Sabbath, sack, school, shrine, silk, sock, sponge, talent, temple, title, verse, zephyr. While cross is Norse from Irish from Latin). Before that still and before the settlehood of the Angles, the Saxons and the Jutes in England, there was an inflow of Latin words (byspell: belt, bin, bishop, butter, cat, chalk, cheese, copper, cup, dish, fork, inch, kettle, kiln, kitchen, line, -monger, mile, mill, mint, mortar, mule, pan, pea, pepper, pillow, pin, pipe, pit, pitch, plum, poppy, pound, purse, Saturday, sickle, street, tile, toll, wall, -wick, wine).

In my wen, flitting Latinish–through–Old-English words is easy to do, but it is rather witless to do so. It is true they are not of theedish fromth, but they came into West Germanic/Anglo-Frisian well before Norse words did and the tung spoken then was as missen as High Teutonlandish is. Withsteading these words does not cleanse Anglish, it befouls it: it makes it more of a whimsily made up tung, than a fanding that tries to be as rightward as.

Is the goal of Anglish to be utterly to reader? Or to ross the bendisomeness of the English tung?