Edit Page
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==== Oversetter's Markup ==== |
==== Oversetter's Markup ==== |
||
⚫ | In this {{over|oversetting|translation}} into Anglish, sundry words are {{over|brooked|used}} instead of "nature" and its {{over|offshoots|derived forms}} such as "natural". The word "nature" comes from the Latin word for "birth", so where {{over|maily|possible}}, a shape of the root word "birth" is brooked, for {{over|bysen|example}}, "inborn" for "natural". In many befallings, the brooking of these words becomes unseemly. In some of these, the feeling called forth by the brooking of "nature" is that of the "beginning" of the thing, a {{over|suchness|quality}} the thing has from its beginning for the sake of the kind of being it is. In others, the feeling is that of the wight- and wortlife and the ongoings of the world selfstanding outside of the body and work of mankind itself. This meaning is overset "the earth". |
||
⚫ | Lastly, in one {{over|shedded|specific}} befalling, Locke brooks the name, "state of nature". In the same way, he also later brooks "law of nature" and "state of war". For this first {{over|quide|phrase}}, these two words together make for a {{over|shedded|special}} hardship in coining an Anglish match. There has been much mooting over the seemly way to overset "state". In the befalling of the quide "state of nature", it is not so much an {{over|inting|matter}} of the body of men and lawframed setups of the {{over|redeship|government}}, but of the {{over|fettle|condition}} in which one stands, or the shape and suchness of a thing as it is now. For this sake, this overset word for "state" is "fettle" in this befalling. |
||
− | ===== Nature ===== |
||
⚫ | In this {{over|oversetting|translation}} into Anglish, sundry words are {{over|brooked|used}} instead of "nature" and its {{over|offshoots|derived forms}} such as "natural". The word "nature" comes from the Latin word for |
||
⚫ | As for "nature", the brooking of the words chosen thus far – namely, some shaping of "birth" or "beginning" seemed to miss the mark or to be unwieldy along with "stead". To say that one is in a "birthfettle" seems to mean that they are as a {{over|bairn|babe}}, {{over|sackless|innocent}} and helpless. This is not the meaning of Locke's "state of nature", which is as said before, the shape and suchness of a thing as it is "in nature" or from its {{over|swith|very}} beginning until now with no {{over|inbreaching|interference}} from a {{over|befouling|corrupting}} {{over|sway|influence}} or {{over|staddling|establishment}} of an {{over|draught|pact}} to frame a new shared redeship beyond the "law of nature". |
||
− | ===== The State of Nature ===== |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | For this sake, another word more streamlined and pithy than the unwieldy "beginning" is brooked, namely "ord". "Ord" comes from Old English and bears the meaning of the foremost bit of a spear, but also the beginning or the {{over|wellspring|source}}. Together, these words build the onsetting brooked herein: "ordfettle". The same way of wordbuilding is then brooked for "law of nature" and "state of war", which are onset, "ordlaw" and "warfettle", {{over|beteeingwise|respectively}}. |
||
⚫ | As for "nature", the brooking of the words chosen thus far – namely, some shaping of |
||
⚫ | For this sake, another word more streamlined and pithy than the unwieldy |
||
− | |||
− | ===== Other Markup ===== |
||
In many befallings, the wellspring of Locke's {{over|ordspringly|original}} [http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/locke1689a.pdf English writing] inholds {{over|foreshortening|abridging}} and {{over|markup|commentary}} from the {{over|bydrafter|editor}}, which are herein marked {{over|slantwise|in italics}}. Unless otherwise {{over|outfoldly|explicitly}} written, the slantwise writings are the work of the first bydrafter; however, in some befallings, further markup is eked to unfold Anglish oversettings or other insights left unsaid before. The writership of this further markup should be {{over|swotel|clear}} to the reader as a {{over|deal|part}} of the Anglishmoot. |
In many befallings, the wellspring of Locke's {{over|ordspringly|original}} [http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/locke1689a.pdf English writing] inholds {{over|foreshortening|abridging}} and {{over|markup|commentary}} from the {{over|bydrafter|editor}}, which are herein marked {{over|slantwise|in italics}}. Unless otherwise {{over|outfoldly|explicitly}} written, the slantwise writings are the work of the first bydrafter; however, in some befallings, further markup is eked to unfold Anglish oversettings or other insights left unsaid before. The writership of this further markup should be {{over|swotel|clear}} to the reader as a {{over|deal|part}} of the Anglishmoot. |
||
Line 511: | Line 507: | ||
But in flesheating wights the yoking lasts longer, as the mother cannot {{over|belive|survive}} and foster her many offspring by her own {{over|spoils|prey}} alone, this being a more {{over|worksome|laborious}} way of living than feeding on grass, as well as a more threatened one. |
But in flesheating wights the yoking lasts longer, as the mother cannot {{over|belive|survive}} and foster her many offspring by her own {{over|spoils|prey}} alone, this being a more {{over|worksome|laborious}} way of living than feeding on grass, as well as a more threatened one. |
||
− | So the he-wight has to help to uphold their shared kindred, which can't belive unhelped until the young can hunt for themselves. This can be seen also with birds, whose young need food in the nest, so that the cock and the hen go on as mates until the young can fly, and can see to themselves. (The only {{over| |
+ | So the he-wight has to help to uphold their shared kindred, which can't belive unhelped until the young can hunt for themselves. This can be seen also with birds, whose young need food in the nest, so that the cock and the hen go on as mates until the young can fly, and can see to themselves. (The only {{over|outstander|exception}} is some tamed birds; the cock needn't feed and take care of the young brood as there is enough food.) |
80. This brings us to what I think is the highest if not the only {{over|frume|reason}} why the he and she of ''mankind'' are bonded together for longer than other makings. It is this: long before a child of mankind can shift for itself without help from his elders, its mother can again {{over|conceive|forseed}} and bear another child; so that the father, who ought to take care for those he has fathered, is tied to go on in yokish fellowship with the same woman for longer than some other makings. |
80. This brings us to what I think is the highest if not the only {{over|frume|reason}} why the he and she of ''mankind'' are bonded together for longer than other makings. It is this: long before a child of mankind can shift for itself without help from his elders, its mother can again {{over|conceive|forseed}} and bear another child; so that the father, who ought to take care for those he has fathered, is tied to go on in yokish fellowship with the same woman for longer than some other makings. |
||
Line 573: | Line 569: | ||
88. That's how it comes about that the meanwealth has the dow of making laws: that is, the dow to set down what strafes are fitting for what misdeeds that dealnimmers of the fellowship wreak; and the dow of war and frith: that is, the dow to strafe any harm done to any of its dealnimmers by anyone who isn't a dealnimmer; |
88. That's how it comes about that the meanwealth has the dow of making laws: that is, the dow to set down what strafes are fitting for what misdeeds that dealnimmers of the fellowship wreak; and the dow of war and frith: that is, the dow to strafe any harm done to any of its dealnimmers by anyone who isn't a dealnimmer; |
||
− | all this being done for the forlasting of ownership of all the dealnimmers of the fellowship, as far as maily. ''Mark the broad meaning given to ''ownership'' near the start of cleaving 87.'' Every man who has come into the borougherly fellowship has thereby yielded his dow to |
+ | all this being done for the forlasting of ownership of all the dealnimmers of the fellowship, as far as maily. ''Mark the broad meaning given to ''ownership'' near the start of cleaving 87.'' Every man who has come into the borougherly fellowship has thereby yielded his dow to strage misdeeds against the ordlaw on the grounds of his own sunder deeming, giving it to the lawmoot in all befallings; |
and along with that he has also given to the meanwealth a right to call on him to forwend ''his'' strength for the bearing out of ''its'' deemings, (which are truly his own deemings, for they are made by himself or by his spokesman). So we have the undershed between the lawmaking and outbearing dows of borougherly fellowship. |
and along with that he has also given to the meanwealth a right to call on him to forwend ''his'' strength for the bearing out of ''its'' deemings, (which are truly his own deemings, for they are made by himself or by his spokesman). So we have the undershed between the lawmaking and outbearing dows of borougherly fellowship. |