The Anglish Moot
Register
No edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Visual edit apiedit
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
'''Steadliness''' inholds a breadth of {{over|mootish|political}} outlooks on steadly outcomes. Meanly, steadliness {{over|belikens|supports}} {{over|ordly waring|local production}} and buying of goods, home wield of {{over|redeship|government}} and {{over|uprearing|promotion}} of one's own {{over|eretide|history}}, {{over|kith|culture}} and {{over|selfhood|identity}}.
==Overlook==
 
Steadliness inholds a reach of mootish outlooks which {{over|foreranks|promotes}} steadly worths. Meanly, steadliness staddles steadly waring and intaking of goods, steadly wield of redeship, and uprearing of steadly eretide, kithship and selfhood.
 
   
 
==Eretide==
 
==Eretide==
Steadliers bepull that throughout the eldworld, most {{over|fellowship and thriftish bodies|social and economic institutions}} have been meted at steadly flak rather than at landship, theedlandship, or world {{over|flak|level}} (until the late 19th-early 20th hundredyears). Only with {{over|oneworldness|globalism}} and the {{over|bulkbuild upwending|industrial revolution}} did steadly metes become cheapened. Most {{over|fultumers|supporters}} of steadliness staddle themselves as warding and edstowing trends of this earlier way of life.
+
Steadliers bepull that throughout the eldworld, most {{over|thriftly bodies and fellowships|social and economic institutions}} have been {{over|ordly meted|scaled at local level}} rather than at {{over|broader flack|regional level}} (land, ethel or world) (until the late 19th-early 20th yearhundreds). Only with {{over|worldliness|globalism}} and the {{over|bulkbuild upwending|industrial revolution}} did steadly metes become downcast. Most {{over|fultumers|supporters}} of steadliness {{over|huy|consider}} themselves as warding and edstowing trends of this earlier way of life.
   
Steadliness draws on a wide reach of shrithings and onlooks that forset that by edstowing ledescores and thrifty ties to the steadly flak, theedish, thiftish and outworld worries will be more fathomsome and loosenings easierly reached. These inhold freedomry, {{over|lifestoweness|bioregionalism}}, lifeworldness, the Greens, and sheerer worries about food, monely handlings and teaching. Mootish fays of all liefs have also sometimes belikened the shift of thrith to steadly leaderships and to make theens more steadly reachsome, shifting more thrith to steadly meanships and in the forgoing, fostering a new link between the ethel, lede and theening.
+
Steadliness draws on a wide breadth of {{over|hedgings|concerns}} and {{over|shrithings|movements}} and {{over|ettles|proposes}} that by edstowing folk and {{over|thrifful ties|economic relationships}} to the steadly flack, {{over|theedish|social}}, {{over|thiftish|economical}} and {{over|umworld|environmental}} worries can be fathomed and {{over|loosenings|solutions}} easierly begotten. These inhold {{over|freedomry|anarchism}}, {{over|lifestoweness|bioregionalism}}, lifeworldness, the Greens, and sheerer worries about food, monely handlings and leering. Mootish thedes of all wens have also sometimes belikened the shift of thrith to steadly leaderships and to make {{over|theens |services, from OE þēnest, cf. NHG Dienst}} as ordly as can, shifting more thrith to steadly meanships and thereby fostering a new link between the {{over|land, folk and work|state, citizens and services}}.
   
Beginning in the 1980s, a markedly seenly flow of steadliness in the BFA was a shrithing to buy steadly made wares. This shrithing orded with kindly farming and likely earned bremeness forof growing unquemeness with lifefood sickering and the failing thriftish forelie of bulkbuild farming for small farmers. While the bespeakers of steadly intaking draw on wardedness rakes, they also asked firstly to an outworldish rake: that {{over|besnitness|pollution}} frumed by carrying goods was a fremeless outerord in a world thrift, and one that even steadlywitherers could greatly lessen. Also, outworld worries can be met when beshuting thrith is held by those {{over|berined|affected}} by the worries instead of thrith reves that do not understand the needs of steadly meanships.
+
Beginning in the 1980s, a flow of steadliness in the BFA was a shrithing to buy steadly made goods. It {{over|orded|originated}} with {{over|lund|organic}} farming and likely earned {{over|bremeliness|impetus}} for of growing mistrust of farming metes and the failing ways of bulkbuild farming onset on small farmers. While the bespeakers of steadliness draw on {{over|munding metes|protectionist measures}}, they also outwordly ettled that {{over|besnittering|pollution}} from carrying goods was a great {{over|outerord|externality}} in a world thrift, and one that could be greatly dwindled by home farming. Also, outworld worries can be met while thrith is wielded by those {{over|berined|affected}} by their worries, rather than by reeving and money.
   
 
==Steadliness as a Mootish Lorelief==
 
==Steadliness as a Mootish Lorelief==
In the early 21st hundredyear, steadliers have often found themselves alined with chides of oneworldness. Sunderings of steadliness are mostly within the Green shrithing. Steadliness of this kind seeks to answer the worries made by worldspanning with calls to shorten alltheedish trade and to seek to settle thrifts built on steadly self-fulldoing only.
+
In the early 21st yearhundred, steadliers have often found themselves alined with {{over|bechidings of oneworldness|critics of globalization}}. Steadliness is often found among the Greens. Steadliness of this kind seeks to tackle the worries made by oneworldness, with calls to shorten {{over|altheedish|international}} trade and looking to settle {{over|thrifts|economies}} built on stowly self-feeding only.
   
Some steadliers believe that fellowship should be {{over|stighted|organized}} mootishly along meanship lines, with each meanship being free to steer its own howes in whatever trend its lede see fit. In every meanship, lede would be kithy and hanging onto each other - which can only be forseen within a small town or ham.
+
Some steadliers believe that fellowship should be {{over|faded|organized}} along {{over|meanship|community}} lines, each being free to wield its own business in whatever trend ans span they wish.
   
The worries belonging the world today can only be loosened by edstaddling the working of those kindly frameworks which once met our needs: by fully brooking those hefty rawstuffs: the onelepy, inherds, meanships and lifewebs, which together make up the lifefield or true world.
+
The worries of the world today can only be ongot by bringing back the working of those kindly and ordly frameworks which once met our needs: by fully brooking those hefty raws: {{over|the onelep, kinhoods, meanships and lifemetes|individual people, families, communities and ecosystems}}, which together make up the {{over|lifeweb|biosphere}} or true world.
   
 
==Steadliness and the 3rd world==
 
==Steadliness and the 3rd world==
Many steadliers are bethoughtened with the worries of the unfolding of the third world. Many {{over|abet|advocate}} that third world ethels should seek to trust their own goods and theens to forcome unfair trade links with the forthriven world, eventhough they still hang upon alltheedish trade for the time being.
+
Many steadliers are ongot with the worries of the unfolding of the third world. Many {{over|abet|advocate}} that third world ethels should seek to trust their own goods and theens to {{over|mithe|avoid}} unfair trade links with the weal world, eventhough they still hang on world trade for the time being.
   
Some steadliers are also against ledeinrush from arm ethels to rich ones. One of the worries they think upshots from such ledeinrush is the sieve of witful ledes of poor ethels, so called brain sieving. For byspell, in the last tenyear Bulgaria is deemed to have lost more than 50,000 {{over|ongot witshapers|recognized scientists}} and skilled workers through outrushing every year. About one fifth of them were highly learnt {{over|besunderers|specialists}} in wendstuffcraft, lifelore, healthlore and stuffcraft.
+
Some steadliers are also against {{over|inwandering|immigration}}. One of the worries they think arises is the loss of the witful folk of poor ethels, so called brain drain. For byspell, in the last tenyear Bulgaria is deemed to have lost more than 50 thousand {{over|ongot witshapers|recognized scientists}} and skilled workers through outwandering every year. About one fifth of them were highly learnt {{over|ongot|specialists}} in andwork, lifelore, healthlore and sprycraft.
   
==Altheedly links==
+
==Altheedish links==
Some steadliers are also against mootish meddling by far away reveships. They believe that meanships should find loosenings to their own worries and in their own time, in what ever trend they choose. They believe that all fellowships can reach longrun frith once given the {{over|tideliness|opportunity}} to do so.
+
Some steadliers are also against {{over|mootish meddling|political interventions}} and frithmunding metes. They believe that meanships should find loosenings to their own worries and in their own time, in what ever trend they choose. They believe that all fellowships can davenly reach frith in the longrun.
   
 
==Steadliness outcarrying==
 
==Steadliness outcarrying==
Steadliness often tokens fellowship deeds or trends which spur or beliken steadly and small-span undertakings. This is in witherstand to big, far-spanning frameworks for carry-outs or belief. Steadliness can therefore be witherstood with oneworldness.
+
Steadliness often tokens fellowship deeds or trends which spur or beliken steadly and small-span undertakings. This is in {{over|withmete|contrast}} to wide, far-spanning frameworks for outwork or belief. Steadliness can therefore be withmeted with oneworldness.
   
==Busens of steadliness are:==
+
==Bysens of steadliness are:==
*The slow food shrithing, brooking sundry, yeartidely, kindly food in {{over|backlash|reaction}} to manytheedish thrifting of food which is samewise, made in a bulkbuild manner, called fast food.
+
*The slow food shrithing, brooking {{over|sundry|diverse}}, {{over|yeartidely|seasonal}}, {{over|lund|natural}} food in {{over|backlash|reaction}} to {{over|manytheedish thrifting|multinational commercialization}} of food which is samewise, made in a bulkbuild manner, called fast food.
   
*Steadliness in news to prop a sundry news means in backlash to rising kerneled wield.
+
*Steadliness in news to spry a shedded news means in backlash to rising {{over|kerneled wield|corporate control}}.
   
*Shire reding, where small meanship moots make fremeful beshutings, that can lead to selfsunderness from landship or thedish reding.
+
*Shire reding, where small meanship moots make fremeful {{over|beshutings|decisions}}, that can lead to selfshedding from landship or thedish reding.
   
*Workers' moots, where the underlings of a given workstead talk and formeal with their overling, rather than have this done by a theedish fay which may be far from steadly worries.
+
*Workers' moots, where the underlings of a given workstead talk and {{over|formeal|negociate}} with their overling, rather than have this done by a thedish fay which may not deal with steadly worries.
   
 
*{{over|Latenewness|postmodernism}} can be seen as a kind of kithship steadliness, where widespread kithship trends may be shunned for lede putting forth their own worths.
 
*{{over|Latenewness|postmodernism}} can be seen as a kind of kithship steadliness, where widespread kithship trends may be shunned for lede putting forth their own worths.

Revision as of 08:33, 18 July 2017

Steadliness inholds a breadth of mootish outlooks on steadly outcomes. Meanly, steadliness belikens ordly waring and buying of goods, home wield of redeship and uprearing of one's own eretide, kith and selfhood.

Eretide

Steadliers bepull that throughout the eldworld, most thriftly bodies and fellowships have been ordly meted rather than at broader flack (land, ethel or world) (until the late 19th-early 20th yearhundreds). Only with worldliness and the bulkbuild upwending did steadly metes become downcast. Most fultumers of steadliness huy themselves as warding and edstowing trends of this earlier way of life.

Steadliness draws on a wide breadth of hedgings and shrithings and ettles that by edstowing folk and thrifful ties to the steadly flack, theedish, thiftish and umworld worries can be fathomed and loosenings easierly begotten. These inhold freedomry, lifestoweness, lifeworldness, the Greens, and sheerer worries about food, monely handlings and leering. Mootish thedes of all wens have also sometimes belikened the shift of thrith to steadly leaderships and to make theens as ordly as can, shifting more thrith to steadly meanships and thereby fostering a new link between the land, folk and work.

Beginning in the 1980s, a flow of steadliness in the BFA was a shrithing to buy steadly made goods. It orded with lund farming and likely earned bremeliness for of growing mistrust of farming metes and the failing ways of bulkbuild farming onset on small farmers. While the bespeakers of steadliness draw on munding metes, they also outwordly ettled that besnittering from carrying goods was a great outerord in a world thrift, and one that could be greatly dwindled by home farming. Also, outworld worries can be met while thrith is wielded by those berined by their worries, rather than by reeving and money.

Steadliness as a Mootish Lorelief

In the early 21st yearhundred, steadliers have often found themselves alined with bechidings of oneworldness. Steadliness is often found among the Greens. Steadliness of this kind seeks to tackle the worries made by oneworldness, with calls to shorten altheedish trade and looking to settle thrifts built on stowly self-feeding only.

Some steadliers believe that fellowship should be faded along meanship lines, each being free to wield its own business in whatever trend ans span they wish.

The worries of the world today can only be ongot by bringing back the working of those kindly and ordly frameworks which once met our needs: by fully brooking those hefty raws: the onelep, kinhoods, meanships and lifemetes, which together make up the lifeweb or true world.

Steadliness and the 3rd world

Many steadliers are ongot with the worries of the unfolding of the third world. Many abet that third world ethels should seek to trust their own goods and theens to mithe unfair trade links with the weal world, eventhough they still hang on world trade for the time being.

Some steadliers are also against inwandering. One of the worries they think arises is the loss of the witful folk of poor ethels, so called brain drain. For byspell, in the last tenyear Bulgaria is deemed to have lost more than 50 thousand ongot witshapers and skilled workers through outwandering every year. About one fifth of them were highly learnt ongot in andwork, lifelore, healthlore and sprycraft.

Altheedish links

Some steadliers are also against mootish meddling and frithmunding metes. They believe that meanships should find loosenings to their own worries and in their own time, in what ever trend they choose. They believe that all fellowships can davenly reach frith in the longrun.

Steadliness outcarrying

Steadliness often tokens fellowship deeds or trends which spur or beliken steadly and small-span undertakings. This is in withmete to wide, far-spanning frameworks for outwork or belief. Steadliness can therefore be withmeted with oneworldness.

Bysens of steadliness are:

  • The slow food shrithing, brooking sundry, yeartidely, lund food in backlash to manytheedish thrifting of food which is samewise, made in a bulkbuild manner, called fast food.
  • Steadliness in news to spry a shedded news means in backlash to rising kerneled wield.
  • Shire reding, where small meanship moots make fremeful beshutings, that can lead to selfshedding from landship or thedish reding.
  • Workers' moots, where the underlings of a given workstead talk and formeal with their overling, rather than have this done by a thedish fay which may not deal with steadly worries.
  • Latenewness can be seen as a kind of kithship steadliness, where widespread kithship trends may be shunned for lede putting forth their own worths.