Steadliness inholds a breadth of mootish outlooks on steadly outcomes. Meanly, steadliness belikens ordly waring and buying of goods, home wield of redeship and uprearing of one's own eretide, kith and selfhood.


Steadliers bepull that throughout the eldworld, most thriftly bodies and fellowships have been ordly meted rather than at broader flack (land, ethel or world) (until the late 19th-early 20th yearhundreds). Only with worldliness and the bulkbuild upwending did steadly metes become downcast. Most fultumers of steadliness huy themselves as warding and edstowing trends of this earlier way of life.

Steadliness draws on a wide breadth of hedgings and shrithings and ettles that by edstowing folk and thrifful ties to the steadly flack, theedish, thiftish and umworld worries can be fathomed and loosenings easierly begotten. These inhold freedomry, lifestoweness, lifeworldness, the Greens, and sheerer worries about food, monely handlings and leering. Mootish thedes of all wens have also sometimes belikened the shift of thrith to steadly leaderships and to make thewings as ordly as can, shifting more thrith to steadly meanships and thereby fostering a new link between the land, folk and work.

Beginning in the 1980s, a flow of steadliness in the BFA was a shrithing to buy steadly made goods. It orded with lund farming and likely earned bremeliness for of growing mistrust of farming metes and the failing ways of bulkbuild farming onset on small farmers. While the bespeakers of steadliness draw on munding metes, they also outwordly ettled that besnittering from carrying goods was a great outerord in a world thrift, and one that could be greatly dwindled by home farming. Also, outworld worries can be met while thrith is wielded by those berined by their worries, rather than by reeving and money.

Steadliness as a Mootish Lorelief

In the early 21st yearhundred, steadliers have often found themselves alined with bechidings of oneworldness. Steadliness is often found among the Greens. Steadliness of this kind seeks to tackle the worries made by oneworldness, with calls to shorten altheedish trade and looking to settle thrifts built on stowly self-feeding only.

Some steadliers believe that fellowship should be faded along meanship lines, each being free to wield its own business in whatever trend ans span they wish.

The worries of the world today can only be ongot by bringing back the working of those kindly and ordly frameworks which once met our needs: by fully brooking those hefty raws: the onelep, kinhoods, meanships and lifemetes, which together make up the lifeweb or true world.

Steadliness and the 3rd world

Many steadliers are ongot with the worries of the unfolding of the third world. Many abet that third world ethels should seek to trust their own goods and theens to mithe unfair trade links with the weal world, eventhough they still hang on world trade for the time being.

Some steadliers are also against inwandering. One of the worries they think arises is the loss of the witful folk of poor ethels, so called brain drain. For byspell, in the last tenyear Bulgaria is deemed to have lost more than 50 thousand ongot witshapers and skilled workers through outwandering every year. About one fifth of them were highly learnt ongot in andwork, lifelore, healthlore and sprycraft.

Altheedish links

Some steadliers are also against mootish meddling and frithmunding metes. They believe that meanships should find loosenings to their own worries and in their own time, in what ever trend they choose. They believe that all fellowships can davenly reach frith in the longrun.

Steadliness outcarrying

Steadliness often tokens fellowship deeds or trends which spur or beliken steadly and small-span undertakings. This is in withmete to wide, far-spanning frameworks for outwork or belief. Steadliness can therefore be withmeted with oneworldness.

Bysens of steadliness are:

  • The slow food shrithing, brooking sundry, yeartidely, lund food in backlash to manytheedish thrifting of food which is samewise, made in a bulkbuild manner, called fast food.
  • Steadliness in news to spry a shedded news means in backlash to rising kerneled wield.
  • Shire reding, where small meanship moots make fremeful beshutings, that can lead to selfshedding from landship or thedish reding.
  • Workers' moots, where the underlings of a given workstead talk and formeal with their overling, rather than have this done by a thedish fay which may not deal with steadly worries.
  • Latenewness can be seen as a kind of kithship steadliness, where widespread kithship trends may be shunned for lede putting forth their own worths.
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.